Discussion Forum: Catalog: Message 1447090
 Previous Message   Next Message 
 Author: Admin_Russell View Messages Posted By Admin_Russell
 Posted: Jan 9, 2024 00:21
 Subject: Important proposal regarding catalog variants
 Viewed: 9867 times
 Topic: Catalog
 Status:Open
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

Admin_Russell

Location:  USA, California
Member Since Contact Type Status
May 9, 2017 Contact Member Admin
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
BrickLink Administrator
Hello everyone,

As a platform, we have decided to take a hard look at some of the mold variants
that we are currently asking you to recognize. For sellers, more variants means
extra sorting and extra work while pulling orders, plus the issues that arise
from variant misunderstandings.

For buyers, excess variants mean that it's harder to assemble a wanted list,
find stores, and ultimately obtain the parts you are looking for.

I have put together a quick Help page to outline these proposed changes:

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2625

Notice the date on this is coming up quickly (Feb 1), so I'm not giving a
lot of time for discussion. I'm aiming for about 1 week of discussion and
then we'll give sellers 2 weeks to adjust the descriptions on affected items
if they wish to retain the distinctions.

I plan to construct a full FAQ page with answers to all your questions. This
will serve to inform users about what was done here in February 2024, and also
help point the catalog in the right direction in the future.

To get started, I'll list a few here:

1. This sounds like you're dumbing down the BrickLink catalog to make
it easier for new users. Is that what is going on?


Not really. There are many, many other variants we expect people to sort and
care about. These ones don't really seem to matter much, and some of them
(e.g., the minifigure heads) actually cause problems for the catalog that cannot
be corrected otherwise.

2. What if I really care about a certain variant that is going away? Can I
still buy and sell that variant?


Absolutely! You can add notes to your listings to make them as "determined"
as you wish. Buyers can still search within notes for extra details, or they
can simply observe them as they browse listings.

3. How do I know which exact variants will be merged? I only see one example
in each category.


Please ask in this thread and I can be very specific. Usually we are talking
about a handful of parts and the printed versions.

4. Has a merge like this ever been done before?

Yes, there was a precedent - the Headlight Brick with Slot:

https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1016584

It was marked for deletion a few years ago and was finally merged last August.

5. Are these the only parts up for consideration, or are there other variants
that will be merged as well?


This is all for now. Based on how well this goes, we may elect to remove other
entries later. However, we will keep all functional variants and important cosmetic
variants.

Message Has 202 Replies:

View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - hpoort (413)
As a database engineer, this is the worst idea ever. To dumb down your core database rather than solving it on the usage side. As suggested many times before, why don't you [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Nubs_Select (3783)
I see in the list that there are some space torsos so does that mean (Part 973p90c05,1) And (Part 973p90new2c05,1) Would be merged? Or am I misunderstanding. The old version [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - popsicle (6665)
[...] A tough and long overdue tackle, Russell. Bravo! You've got my support, in this no doubt undesirable yet much needed BL task. Anyone willing to stop the can from [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread (Cancelled) - RecycledBrick (8939)
(Cancelled)
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - PlanetEarthToys (118)
[...] it would be nice if when anyone typed in the number on the brick in the search bar & hit enter, it popped up all options associated with that number.. {hypothetical [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - novabrick (14556)
[...] So, you merge the seat variants but keep (Part 3855,12) and (Part 3855a,12) At least I think it's a similar thing. Christian novabrick-team
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Stellar (3505)
For the sake of usability with the system we have now on Bricklink I understand this change, but please don't forget the countless hours and thousand contributions from a [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Polentone (6)
We know you are joking but don't scare us with this idea. For real, it will damage the site. Just keep it the way it is or just use the suggestions of the other users in [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - WOLKsite (13)
While I am one who would advocate for variants, the line has to be drawn somewhere reasonable as they get out of hand quickly otherwise. However, for many of these there's [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - TakeAbricK (13472)
[...] As a seller I'm absolutely not happy with removing variants that have been in the catalog for quite some time. A Minifigure head 3626b that shows in inventories, [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Hurt (642)
[...] I would love to have a catalog as detailed as possible (e.g. the bottom pin form of a regular 1 x 2 plate, either filled or with a hole), while at the same time [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - yorbrick (1185)
I can definitely see the advantage of getting rid of variants that are not really important such as the interior type "connections between studs", sprue marks and similar. [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Lonely_Brick_OH (10058)
The multiple items based upon the exact same part (variants) have been horrible for many of our sorters. Most of them are not LEGO people and just help us sort out the [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Reki_Lobsheek (2464)
I personally applaud this idea. The amount of "variants" that don't show any functional difference is becoming absurd IMO and I can only imagine the nightmare for [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Dino (479)
This site is degenerating more and more into a random site. If you don't care what part variants there are and where they were used, you might as well use the inventory lists [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Darth_Smithy (1307)
I love it. It was getting a little crazy with variants. In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes: [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Brickitty (6460)
Hi, I'm opposed to this. As one of the sellers who differentiates every part carefully, I frequently get messages asking me to confirm which variant I'm sending. Buyers [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - infinibrix (5003)
[...] Russell, thanks for reaching out to the community on this. Whilst I understand the concerns from collectors/contributors I think we have to consider using a system that [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - rylie_aitch (250)
As a builder, these differences are often genuinely functionally and aesthetically relevant. I would hate to have to ask every time, or risk getting a random mix if I need a [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Stuart9 (1067)
This will mean that changing all affected present variations to a standard number, if it happens; anything I already have sorted to present variation numbers need sorting again [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - calebfishn (2143)
Thanks for posting this, and for considering the input of users here.
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Emperor_Penguin (1361)
Less mold-variant listings! 👏👏👏
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - tec (61)
Please NO. We actually need more/better handling of variants. We should recognize more variants right now. BL already behind Rebrickable on variant handling. behind. a lot. really.
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - zorbanj (820)
[...] I read through this thread with great interest. Looks like there is some confusion as to what the end result will be. Maybe you could make an addition to the Help page [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - BricksOfFaith (149)
No. Please don’t. You aren’t thinking about vintage parts that will be merged with its reissue, for instance the classic space minifgure parts. I don’t want any parts from 2020. [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal - Why? Did it break ? - StarBrick (7072)
Although the effort is praise worthy, I am not sure what would happen if we do NOT change anything. I expect no decrease in accessabilitiy, functionality, security etc. On the [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread (Cancelled) - UTLF (1267)
(Cancelled)
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Dhobeck (33)
Please don’t forget about the VINTAGE parts. This CHANGE will make it SUPER HARD to get the older molds of parts. I don’t think I’m the only person who thinks this way.
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - CCBricks (2372)
This is like being invited to a taffy pulling contest where everyone picks their nose! A giant mess in my opinion. Leave the catalog the way it is, block the variants from [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Yo_Yo_Flamingo (4577)
[...] I 100% approve. The proliferation of all these non-helpful variants only hurts buyers and sellers alike. I also urge you to keep going with this- example, who gives a [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 9, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - pcthurman (1213)
[...] I have read through the entirety of this subject, here are my opinions... Do not change anything that has to do with minifigures! People who buy them OR parts of them [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 10, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Give.Me.A.Brick (10611)
I sympathize with people that are against but I personally support this idea, which I think is long overdue. Let's face it, most buyers don't care, and those few who [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 10, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - musen2100 (270)
[...] I like this change as long as you don't merge significant parts such as the jumper plates. How will this affect selling complete sets? If for instance I am selling [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 10, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Yo_Yo_Flamingo (4577)
[...] Other useless variants for future consideration: (Part 30193,85) (Part 18738,86) (Part 60176,34) (Part 89652,85)
(4 months ago, Jan 10, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - CBak (309)
Rather than merging everything into one category, could we instead use the part# and part#old nomenclature. Notes do not carry over to the price guide, so at least this will [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 10, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - jennnifer (3535)
Hello, I think one point I would like to emphasize is that many of these variants (while not being particularly important as to function or aesthetics) DO serve the purpose [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 10, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - donja_nl (7769)
I think it is not a good idea. The promotional Duplo Bricks are sold to buyers that collect these special bricks. They are interested in special variants. Sellers have invested [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 10, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - bagelboybugle (3408)
[...] I'm a little out of touch with this so apologies if I've missed something. Back in my selling days I got very frustrated with the amount of irrelevant variation [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 10, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - axaday (7302)
I spent thousands of dollars tracking down 32064c for you. You are welcome. In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes: [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 10, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - LMAinFLA (53)
Sorry if all this has been addressed already, but there were over 200 responses when I found this thread and I didn't have the energy to plow through all of them. So here [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 10, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - WOLKsite (13)
[...] Are notes searchable in any way? Because I don't know them to be. This is kind of moot if you're asking for us to manually look through potentially hundreds of [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 10, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - BensBrickstore (3551)
I think this is way to short of a time period before these changes are being implemented. I have mixed feelings about the changes, particularly with the distinctions on minifig [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 11, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - grimsbricksuk (1478)
The minifig heads should absolutely be removed and dealt with separately, especially if there’s over 1100 of them to consider! That is a lot of work for sellers (& collectors) [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 11, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Teup (6606)
[...] Important problem to address but bad solution IMO, but I won't waste time giving input, so ok, go for it ;) Just a question: Will it affect the item numbers (e.g. [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 11, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - tec (61)
sounds like everything already decided. sould like mama Lego imposed it or else. fearing instant community backlash, someone came up with the idea. if we let them talk, they [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 11, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - 1977_mauro (3396)
But when we remove the variants from the part lists of sets, no one will know anymore which variants have been used in an older set - this will drop the demand of such old variants [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 11, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - axaday (7302)
Can the solution to this issue really not wait for Bricklink to develop a proper umbrella system in the catalog? Will all of my work be totally erased or will it still be recorded [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 11, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - StormChaser (569)
[...] BrickLink could serve all users if the database was designed correctly. I agree the site has added too many variants which are pointless and annoying for the average [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 12, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread (Cancelled) - UTLF (1267)
(Cancelled)
(4 months ago, Jan 12, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Kenopolis (1253)
I've spent the last several hours reading almost all of the comments. I've thought it over, and I have changed my initial knee jerk reaction of, "OH NO!" to something [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 12, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Mads.A (518)
[...] As a seller and vintage collector, I can only say that limiting the variants is the wrong decision, you should make more of it instead and specify in which time period [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 13, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread (Cancelled) - UTLF (1267)
(Cancelled)
(4 months ago, Jan 13, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - brickotronic (12)
I fully understand the problem that you want to solve, but I don't agree with the solution. You can implement a feature which makes consolidating optional. Introduce an official [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 15, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - spacepolice (79)
Please don't do this. I like to restore old sets and want the correct parts from the time period. If this is done it'll affect my buying negatively.
(4 months ago, Jan 16, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - atkk (8630)
How will our inventories change with the merge? For example, if I have the following: 10x 4079b Minifigure, Utensil Seat / Chair 2 x 2 with Center Sprue Mark and 5x 4079 Minifigure, [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 17, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Catalog Variants - SURVEY RESULTS - StormChaser (569)
As we all know, the decision was already made before members were ever consulted. Still, as an exercise in sharing meaningless facts, here is how BrickLink members feel. A [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 17, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - leggodtshop (3863)
Will there be a list of all changes/mergers available? Or is it already available? In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes: [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - rcarhart (208)
Are there any additional "instructions"? Do I need to change my On Hand balances to go from one to the other? In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes: [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - grammasbricks (3100)
Great work Russell! We agree with this change and support the proposal going forward. Gramma's Bricks In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes: [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - BrickDom (419)
This must be a April´s foul. As a seller who is taking it very serious with variants please let it as it is. The `with`or `without Groove`Variant is very important for my customers. [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - e.d.k. (4)
[...] [...] Please don't do this! I am not a seller, but a buyer. Usually I don't care about mould variants... but sometimes I do, e.g. usually I don't want [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - stevetq2 (7913)
Many people want to know the difference between tiles with grooves as the ones without are from older sets and some people want the original part without grooves and some want [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - osca0490 (24)
This seems like a really bad idea. It'll make piecing together old sets much more difficult. The people that use bricklink care about Lego and removing information about [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Jaabo (5248)
I vote no. This is trampling on 20+ years of hard work. Are all the sets from the60s and 70s going to be listed with modern part equivalents? Thats bad if true Catalog, [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - littlefeisty1 (12)
[...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - TmfS (60)
As mainly a customer on bricklink, this solution is not ideal. I am a purist and want the exact part that came with a set. I think you could put a field key in the parts search [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - littlefeisty1 (12)
[...] I'm new to the seller side so need some help understanding this from the buyers side. If a buyer is looking for a specific part, like "Sprue Marks Ex. Part 4079b" [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - BrickDeals (2803)
[...] If we are at a point where this is a priority for Bricklink, why can't we get other things that have been asked for repeatedly? The big one for me is sales tax exemption. [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - quadratique (239)
This is a terrible idea. Instead, please introduce a hierarchy of part > variant, where variant is optional. Not a major development, really: part will have color, condition [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - sonnich (327)
Looking at the list, a picture example for help would be useful (URL) It is just codes and numbers - I feel lost In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes: [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - zeijlemaker (25)
Bad idea. I have a lot of reasons many already spoken on the forum. Too bad I can not "like" most of them. Just don't do it, especially minifigs.
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - cosmicray (3492)
[...] I was unaware this was about to happen (because I was away for a month). My first reaction, is that this is being done to simplify the number of catalog entries [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Sarahginn (3313)
So if I'm having to write the comments how do I know which part number to apply it to? I don't want to spend hours updating to get it wrong and the list published doesn't [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - reni3008 (1811)
I cant find some really important answers: So assuming i have separate lots with different variants, what price will be used after the merge? What happens with the remark field? [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Abrickadabra (4565)
Has consideration been given to the API in this project? It seems to get virtually zero maintenance so I want to highlight at least one pertinent issue. Currently when part [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - OwlBearMom (43)
Please do not do this. Sellers can and do note in their terms whether they distinguish between mold variants. Buyers often pay a bit more for the extra labor sellers put into [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - C13INTZ (165)
Late to the party, and there's a lot to read through that I don't have the time for so sorry if this has been addressed, but I'm not completely familiar with the [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - MeisterDad (176)
DISAGREE.
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Krekeltje62 (1891)
Hi Russell Does this mean you are going to remove existing lots and merge them into a new one? What will happen with the remark fields of the lots? They are now limited to 255 [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - JNoise (487)
As a buyer and seller, this is a really crappy idea. This makes the catalog totally more confusing and if I have a set that has to have a certain part in it but it is no longer [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Biodreamer (110)
Terrible idea I have already hard to find the right mold as a buyer after this it will be nearly impossible to find a store and those stores will most likely hike the prices. [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Sixracer (148)
Disappointing for collectors who want to reconstitute vintage sets with accurate period correct parts. Putting the parts in a WishList will now yield a tedious task of sorting [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Saitobricks.ca (37)
For those of you who think this is a good idea, or just don’t care, PLEASE, please watch this video… ……………All the way to the end please. (Analogies will be given near the [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - alohasurf (2)
Please don't! Many already have the reasons.
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - jadebates (14)
As many others have said previously, this is not a good idea. This is erasing LEGO's history and the hard work of many fans who have documented the history of these different [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - montana_girl (3744)
Like many others, I'm late on commenting and read through quite a few of the comments. I am on the "please, don't do this side." My reasoning is the same [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - SnarkBricks (9838)
NO! Our store sorts parts by the minutest detail and variant. I cannot see this transition as anything other than a total disaster for stores like ours - We'd have hundreds [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - NicksVintage (1245)
I have long wondered why the wanted list and magic buy features don't include some kind of auto-check to help buyers make sure they are ordering the mold that they are looking [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - DDSEnt (7259)
I strongly disagree with this change. You are chipping away at what makes BrickLink the premier site it has been for Lego Collector's worldwide. I'm so sorry Daniel :-(. [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - FarmerGadda (1)
[...] This is the opposite direction this website should go- as a database for the historical record of lego's past, it should be MORE granular, not less. I was under the [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - DarthMaul1 (37)
[...] this a really dumb change not all parts were the same back then and the color was different than modern Lego and parts back then are really different doing this will [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Nimitstexan (139)
Please do not do this. Some of the variants (say, the number of teeth on a hinge) are significantly important to the design of certain builds. Not being able to differentiate [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - thegrublord02 (11)
This is going to set a bad precedent when regarding period-appropriate parts in vintage sets, especially in a non-marketplace application, when piecing together a set it's [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Nimitstexan (139)
Please do not do this. Some of the variants (say, the number of teeth on a hinge) are significantly important to the design of certain builds. Not being able to differentiate [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Brickskier (1127)
As a seller and a buyer, this is a very strange change. Many of these consolidated versions have different prices, and the availability and desirability of certain versions of [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - hug_a_brick (517)
Bricklink is a community, not a platform. Since Bricklink is a platform, you really think this and other dumb things are a good idea. If Bricklink were a community, you would [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - treeman838 (73)
PROCEED WITH CAUTION. I understand that some variants are interchangeable but there are MANY that are not. Vintage pieces need to remain separate. If I want a 3794a without bottom [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Nostrix (42)
This is a terrible idea. Many parts have significant aesthetic, functional, and price differences for minor differences in mouldings. This will end up with buyers potentially [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - randyipp (3478)
What a bad idea, this is certainly detrimental to anyone working on vintage sets.
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - MrBer (64)
As a database engineer and a frequent user of bricklink ... thank you. Database design is a balance, recording unimportant details can bog down a database, really undermining [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Rarah (576)
[...] Yes please! Much appreciated as many of the variants would only cause headache and no function or visual difference in any of those.
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Ayden (0)
[...] Bricklink’s worst update I’ve ever seen. Completely removes the point of Bricklink being a Lego Database.
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - stevetq2 (7913)
BIG RESPONSE SINCE EMAIL WENT OUT AGAINST THIS CHANGE BrickLink is a DATABASE, there are different entries for GOOD reason, what we are being asked to do is create our OWN entries [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - stevetq2 (7913)
This is a retrograde step, as well as degrading the BrickLink Database it will cause disappointment for buyers looking for specific mould types particularly for vintage sets, [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - stevetq2 (7913)
Where there are TWO entries for mini-figures with a different stud head will be used as there is 1) sometimes a big difference in price between the two variants and 2) [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - jerkbegjohn (1)
this is bad for bricklink. please dont shoot self in foot, bricklink.
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Timko (180)
What the heck. Please no. Its important for Vintage Sets! Buyers will be mad if they get a 2022 space torso instead of one out of the 80s. Bricklink getting worse and worse since [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Toypop (194)
[...] Terrible idea, please BL do not implement this change. It matters to a lot of people to get the specific time period part, and also matters this website is the best resource [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - marshallx (262)
Please no. From the list of proposed changes, inside supports, connections between studs, frosted lines, smooth/textured slopes and grooves are all very important to me. The [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - teric2 (540)
[...] I spend many hours a day referencing Brinklink inventory to validate LEGO sets, especially vintage LEGO sets. I am curious if there is a way to save a copy of the current [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Chris_138 (867)
hello, I'm with you. +++
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - thebrickmonster (92)
As a collector, this will complete destroy the usability of the site. Re-think this change because I will boycott.
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - WilliamS (172)
This is a terrible idea. Many of these differences are functional differences, which affect the use of the part in particular techniques. Merging them will make it harder for [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Janettoe (816)
I agree with a lot of the comments - I don't like variants but for the authenticity of the set they are often needed. That said, however, most sets have alternate items, [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Damon20 (40)
BrickLink, This is a HORRIBLE idea which will make it near impossible to locate (and sell) period-accurate pieces. One example would be bricks with inside support and [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Wookie305 (83)
I highly disagree with this procedure. These are significant enough differences to need listing. There is already plenty of quality concerns without finding a bag full of parts [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - isaacmflorez101 (5570)
I strongly disagree with this! Please don't let it happen 🤞 In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes: [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - kidcastle1215 (68)
[...] I do understand that variants can get out of control, but I want to have the ability to list exactly what I have so (a) buyers who care get what they want and [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Tusserte (1125)
As a buyer, I do not think this is a good change. Most of these variants have significant functional or visual differences so I want to know which one I should be getting. It [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - RedSun (85)
This is a TERRIBLE idea, and will only make for MORE work for the seller and buyer when specific variants are needed. Additionally, Bricklink is also used for historical reference. [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Tazz (220)
Question please - will everyones stock be automatically be moved when the merge happens? In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes: [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - tigger77 (231)
I'll join the chorus and say this is a horrible idea. As others have suggested, simply add a dropdown the same way you currently have for color. The default when you go to [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Yo_Yo_Flamingo (4577)
[...] I'll once again say, thanks for the change! :) I'd still like to see actual zone-based auto checkout for the USA. Any ideas on when that will be implemented?
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - sirhcx (32)
I think this has good intentions but boils down to finding a solution for a problem that doesnt really exist. If sellers are going to need to put in some extra leg work to sort [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - BrianDan (86)
[...] Please, god no. I hate this. I've used the granularity multiple times to make sure I was getting the correct replacement variant for classic and older sets. Having [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 24, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread (Cancelled) - UTLF (1267)
(Cancelled)
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - clrv4000 (116)
I am quite displeased with this change. I already have enough trouble ordering the correct variants for completing sets accurately, as many sellers are too lazy to separate [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Yo_Yo_Flamingo (4577)
[...] While we're all here and fired up about part variants... I'll take this time to point out that the inventory for set (Set 8744-1) includes a part variant in a [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - mrg8472 (277)
Please, don't do this! Sellers won't make distinctions for these items, it is profitable to be lazy about this. Also, how should they know that there are different versions [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - giedriu5 (38)
I don't like it :( . This will make it harder to check set inventory. In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes: [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - porschecm2 (170)
This would be a very bad idea. I would love to see many updates to the catalog, but merging existing variants is not one of them. You say these "don't seem to be that [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - benelson (96)
Though I have an active seller account, I was unaware of this impending change until Bricklink actually emailed members, two weeks after this forum posting. (I nearly typed [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - paulmison (60)
I'm going to guess I'm not the first person to note this, but there are a lot of replies to dig through, so I'm posting it anyway. Compare and contrast these lines [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - zpiotrak (69)
I think this is worst idea ever. You are destroying history and a work a lot of people who catalogued all those things. Now it won't even be possible to check whether older [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Cleefuzz (22)
This move is not well thought through. I really hope this decision will be reversed. Some people try to complete vintage sets down to the exact piece, while others don't [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread (Cancelled) - breesy (212)
(Cancelled)
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - blockbuster (16158)
Hello All, This is a badly conceived idea that should be reversed. If a seller files parts under part number some part numbers are going to change therefore locating the part [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Duq (379)
[...] How exactly do you see that working? Sellers are going to have different ways to describe variants so it's going to be hell for buyers looking for specific variants, [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - otaznik (309)
I think this is a really bad idea. You will put in a trash can all time and work what sellers gave to sorting to have suitable offer for customers who are looking for exact mold [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - reslig (317)
This is a terrible idea. Please do not implement it. In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes: [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - cart_rudo (1628)
hi this idea is really a poor one. everybody uses Bricklink to check inventories - also for old and really old sets. so if the catalog will be reduced to a catalog without any [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - steentjesseller (696)
Nooooo! This is a VERY bad idea. Don't do this! Bricklink is the only place that accurately keeps track of these mould differences. Both as a buyer AND as a seller I care [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - nuukee (250)
Hi, what I do not understand and have not seen addressed neither in the email nor in the help page: What happens to my current inventory? How can I easily find out what is affected? [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - GraysBricks (8261)
HI, Sounds positive overall. In the future please could seller email announcements for some important news come out at the same time as forum posts. For those of us that [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - bricknationtoys (7414)
We at Bricknation Toys are against the changes in the proposed form for a number of reasons. BrickLink on many occasions throughout the years claimed that the extensive catalogue [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - corkscrewloop (105)
One of the main reasons to use Bricklink is to know all mold variants which exist from a part, especially since for many projects a dedicated mold is required or to be avoided. [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - SB.Shop (48)
I Guess for some parts the might be useful when the difference of the mold does not make any difference on how the brick can be used or build. But for Hinges with Teeth - Ex. [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - stevetq2 (7913)
Since the email went out there has been a massive backlash about this change. I suggest everyone sends their concerns directly to BrickLink Admin (via the help page) [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - zombitroid (586)
If I have parts in these categories, will I need to relist them after the variants are deleted or will they still show in my store? I feel like this question should be in the [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Dusty_King (69)
[...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - revilor (198)
Hello Bricklink-Team, I appreciate all the work you do for the LEGO community, but please consider to not put this change to the database in place. A better way IMHO would be [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - johniv4 (315)
a needed change. I mean lets face reality lego changes molds from plant to plant and even mid production runs, in most of my mocs I don't care about the version and it makes [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - the_lego_zora (144)
Please don't do this. It will make it much harder to get the right pieces. For those who don't care about the difference, They could still find a piece before. For those [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - vortexico (52)
This is a Terrible idea, please do not do this!!! A lot of these merges are not compatible functionally and cosmetically. Such changes are irreversible and completely undermine [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - longwallmining (863)
[...] Ok, who’s upset the new owner…?? What a tuff start to this years KPI targets.
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - JulieK (8980)
Hi Russell, On the page that lists the variant merges, can BL list them with a link to the catalog? It would be a big time saver for us to check if we have the parts in our [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread (Cancelled) - DDSEnt (7259)
(Cancelled)
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - icebeast (22)
For me it's a huge NO. Being able to tell apart some of the variations of bricks is essential for completing sets. This affects not only the collectors, but also those who [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - kiyoshioni (187)
[...] This is not a great idea. I think most people who make MOCs want specific pieces and don't want to roll the dice to see if they get the correct variant of a piece. [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - wahiggin (2863)
[...] I've been restoring sets from the 80's and 90's and some of these differences are important. I vote no to this idea. Volunteers helped make the database [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - ioculus (80)
There are pros and cons (as usual). Maybe there could be a default mold (the newest one) but the others saved as submolds? The thing is that when buying bricks [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Daz_Hoo (154)
[...] Of all the things that could (and should) be improved with Bricklink, merging parts variants in the catalog should not be the top priority for Bricklink admins. [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Tarkur (124)
I hope that the BrickLink administration team has really considered all the ramifications of this action. Especially when it comes to buyer protection and in terms of preventing [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Addminek (690)
That's very bed news completing old sets will be impossible please change Your mind and do not do this
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - halvorsen (660)
It will significantly degrade the usability of BL for restoration of old/vintage sets. What a shame.
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - misbi (8771)
If tiles 3068b, 3069b and 3070b are to be renumbered with the 'b' suffix removed, how will this affect decorated versions of those tiles? Are all of the decorated tiles [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - icm (98)
This is a BAD idea. Besides the historical value in retaining this information so that we know exactly what mold types were in old sets and exactly when new mold types were introduced, [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - _Nadiki_ (99)
Well since a lot of BrickLink users are talking about this I feel I should throw my two cents in as well. I primarily use BrickLink for buying and research and consider the catalogue [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - mego2k3 (121)
Hi please don't delete such precious information about our beloved bricks forever! Regardless of being a buyer or seller, Bricklink is not just a marketplace, it is the [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - waltzking (8744)
There seem to be 4 sides here. 1. Buyers who DON’T care about the carefully documented LEGO sets, parts and their history. 2. Buyers who DO care about the carefully documented [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 26, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - zpiotrak (69)
Is it possible to make an option on frontend not to care about molds instead of messing with database? This is the only way not to hurt anyone.
(4 months ago, Jan 26, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - JimNoBrick (41)
Please DO NOT! Or leave some option left to check. I know that many sellers and buyers do not distinguish this, but as it turns out, when rebuilding old sets, it makes a difference. [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 26, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - goozle (497)
This change is horrendous for both buyers and sellers. It's also antithetical to the founding of BL as a hobbyist site that catalogs LEGO, not to mention erasing all the [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 26, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Utter (312)
As a buyer who enjoys restoring old sets, I would prefer you not to do this. I think it's important to restore sets with the proper pieces, as to preserve them for the future.
(4 months ago, Jan 26, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - reidstep (617)
[...] This move is solely to benefit LEGO when they become the primary seller of parts on BrickLink and aren't able to supply order molds that people want, directing all [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 26, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Toypop (194)
This is a horrible idea for used lego sellers (the people it is supposed to help), and collectors alike. Please reconsider this action, as I belive it will drive people [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 26, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Mozzas_Bricks (813)
The point of Bricklink is to find the part you require, not take a chance on whether the item you order is the one you want. Essentially, if Lego has made a variant, then that [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 26, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - PlanetEarthToys (118)
so what you're saying is, The Forum is going to continue to be flooded with this thread / subject for at least 3 more months.... awesome :-|
(4 months ago, Jan 26, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Pluribus7158 (36)
This is by far the worst idea I've seen on here. The Bricklink catalogue IS Bricklink. Changing it in such a fundamental way will ruin what many love about it. A change [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 26, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - erickrarick (19)
This is unwanted and misguided. It will be very frustrating if I think I'm buying modern Lego pieces but then a seller sends an older variant. Similarly it will make it [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 26, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - ButchBricks (238)
[...] This is a poor idea! As a seller, even just with the pieces listed and affected by this change, the potential exists for miscommunication and the delivery of incorrect [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 26, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - bmitchel1976 (587)
I don't get why this is being done. The old "if it ain't broke don't fix it" applys here. If we all of a sudden start listing multiple parts of the same [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 27, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - mego2k3 (121)
Good morning I trying to update my store, deleting the 3747a and 3747b will remain only the 2752 as a usefull part number, but it not has the green color listed, how we have [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 27, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - lms03 (301)
This is the absolute worst thing ever I really hope this doesn’t happen for several reasons. 1 if I’m putting together an older set I’d like to have an older part and 2 some [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 27, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - TheRealTBOC (156)
I'm against this. I understand wanting to make listings easier for sellers or people making lists, but it undermines one of the massive strengths of Bricklink - that it is [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 27, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - monnikje (168)
I can understand that it might help a seller, but for me as a buyer I really hate these dumbing downs. This might be a slippery slope, and before you know it, you must contact [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 27, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread (Cancelled) - The_Boyz_Bricks (113)
(Cancelled)
(4 months ago, Jan 27, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - brick_fleet (34)
this is a terrible idea, these parts that are getting merged have functional differences. This will adversely affect both buyers and sellers on the platform.
(4 months ago, Jan 27, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - MatsuGohei (39)
This does not make any sense; it will make impossible to know the original pieces of older sets. How can I complete an older set for me or to sale if I don’t have any clue, after [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 28, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - WerferOfFlammen (65)
I've never commented on proposed changes here, but I wanted to echo my extreme disappointment with this change. As a passionate Lego fan, enthusiast of complete historical [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 28, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - W.Ford (3)
I am agains this change, I collect predominantly vintage sets, and find the bricklink catalogue incredibly valuable in ensuring the accuracy of my sets. Any merging of variants [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 29, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Duq (379)
[...] ... [...] So after week of discussion in which hundreds of users told you what a stupid idea this is, I assume you're going ahead anyway? If you want to make some [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 29, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - ZoneBrix (3376)
There is decades of die hard fan work in the Bricklink variations part documentation. Deleting and merging lots of them just to please dumb users or lazy clueless scalpers is [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 29, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Brickspert_AU (183)
I've taken some time to gather my thoughts about this before sharing. I think it's going to happen no matter what. That being said there are definitely some better ways [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 29, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - balin (110)
For the record, as a LEGO fan for almost 5 decades and a Bricklink user for over 2 decades I am opposed to any changes that merge pieces such that A) pieces with sufficiently [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 30, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - SRvanKlink (1295)
After over 700 replies in this thread and having read nearly all of them I still see some arguments unaddressed: Bricklink and LEGO do not realise that the whole AFOL community [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 30, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - CatCat (21)
Shocked to read about this intended change. This will substantially reduce the value that BrickLink provides to me.
(4 months ago, Jan 30, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - calebfishn (2143)
I'm looking at this issue and trying to understand it, and decided to throw in my two cents. "For sellers, more variants means extra sorting and extra work while pulling [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 30, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - Tarkur (124)
[...] The more I read these back and forths I realize no matter which side of the coin you are how poorly thought out the update is. I would have much preferred if BrickLink [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 30, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - terosalmela (57)
I am against this change. Or any other action in past or future that diminishes information of what kind of parts and sets the has been. For me it is important to get a Lego [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 31, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - tmspecial (309)
I vote AGINST it!!! If Bricklink choses to move forward with this, then they should ALSO merge all the fig parts: - 1 combined catalog entry for all the heads, NO matter the face [...]
(4 months ago, Feb 1, 2024, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Important proposal regarding catalog variants - brick350 (10341)
Someone help me please! I try to change my inventory according to the new rules, but i'm so confused. If there are only 2 versions of an item, that is clear. But I don't [...]
(3 months ago, Feb 6, 2024, to Catalog)

886 Messages in this Thread.
(Message tree supressed because there are more than 50 messages in this thread)
show message tree

 Previous Message   Next Message 

Entire thread on one page
This message and all its replies on one page