  
| Author: | NoGravitasHere  | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2024 13:07 | | Subject: | Bionicle is handled incredibly poorly | | Viewed: | 332 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I've contacted BrickLink support multiple times via the Help Desk link, and
been ignored every single time. The current system of silver classification is
laughably bad. There are 9 official Lego silvers/chromes/gunmetals, and you only
recognise 4.5, at best.
I have repeatedly offered you the information you need to fix this issue, and
have not once received even a reply for my efforts. Instead, BrickLink is more
interested in maintaining their poorly-categorised colours, removing accurate
listings (how can I include rubber bands with a set, when said rubber bands are
23 years old and dust?), and ignoring the fella trying to literally hand you
the answer to this issue, and also ruining your database by no longer tracking
part variants. You do realise some of those 'insignificant' changes actually
matter, right?
... Right?
|
|
Message Has 5 Replies:  Re: Bionicle is handled incredibly poorly - randyf (442) | [...] Unfortunately for you, you have definitely been going about things the wrong way, and I am sorry for that. Issues that deal with the BrickLink catalog are not governed [...]
(4 months ago, Feb 2, 2024, to Catalog) |
Re: Bionicle is handled incredibly poorly - here4bricks614 (187) | [...] Wolksite perfectly explains the issue at hand in this post: (URL) Please message me if you would like to see a full list of every part that appears in 296 Cool Silver. [...]
(4 months ago, Feb 3, 2024, to Catalog) |
115 Messages in this Thread.
(Message tree supressed because there are more than 50 messages in this thread)
show message tree
Entire thread on one page
This message and all its replies on one page
|
|
New Zealand, Canterbury
