Author:  TakeAbricK  Posted:  Dec 15, 2023 01:24  Subject:  Re: Should part #2335px15 be separated into two?  Viewed:  31 times  Topic:  Catalog Requests Cancel Reply

BrickLink ID Card TakeAbricK (13492) Location:  Netherlands, Gelderland Member Since Contact Type Status Jan 12, 2007 Seller Store: TakeAbricK BrickLink Catalog Administrator (?)

In Catalog Requests, centexbricks writes:    Both parts in the attached photo are listed under part 2335px15. However, as you can see, the printing is slightly different between the two. The part on the left is the light bluish gray version found in set "9679 AT-ST & Endor". On this version the small ovals at the top, the small hexagon, and the large hexagon are all printed in gray. The part on the right is the light gray version found in set "4486 AT-ST & Snowspeeder - Mini". On this version the small ovals at the top, the small hexagon, and the large hexagon are all printed in black. In addition, the small ovals at the top are essentially joined to the large box below them. Also, the two flags use different molds as well. Yes, this part definitely needs to be split. Thanks for catching this.   *  2335px15 Flag 2 x 2 Square with Black SW MINI AT-ST Pattern Parts: Flag, Decorated The molds are under the same catalog entry, so they will get the same item number though. Thanks, Diana

Message is in Reply To:

Should part #2335px15 be separated into two? - centexbricks (148)

Both parts in the attached photo are listed under part 2335px15. However, as you can see, the printing is slightly different between the two. The part on the left is the light [...] (6 months ago, Dec 14, 2023, to Catalog Requests)

2 Messages in this Thread:

 Msg 1 - centexbricks (148) 6 months ago Dec 14, 2023 to Catalog Requests
 Msg 2 « - TakeAbricK (13492) 6 months ago Dec 15, 2023 to Catalog Requests