Discussion Forum: Catalog Requests: Message 1443574
 Previous Message   Next Message 
 Author: centexbricks View Messages Posted By centexbricks
 Posted: Dec 14, 2023 19:47
 Subject: Should part #2335px15 be separated into two?
 Viewed: 83 times
 Topic: Catalog Requests
 For:Catalog Associate
 Status:Completed
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

centexbricks (145)

Location:  USA, Texas
Member Since Contact Type Status
Jan 13, 2021 Contact Member Buyer
Buying Privileges - OK
Both parts in the attached photo are listed under part 2335px15. However, as
you can see, the printing is slightly different between the two.

The part on the left is the light bluish gray version found in set "9679
AT-ST & Endor". On this version the small ovals at the top, the small hexagon,
and the large hexagon are all printed in gray.

The part on the right is the light gray version found in set "4486 AT-ST
& Snowspeeder - Mini". On this version the small ovals at the top, the small
hexagon, and the large hexagon are all printed in black. In addition, the small
ovals at the top are essentially joined to the large box below them.

Also, the two flags use different molds as well.
 

Message Has 1 Reply:

View Thread Re: Should part #2335px15 be separated into two? - TakeAbricK (13472)
[...] Yes, this part definitely needs to be split. Thanks for catching this. (Part 2335px15) The molds are under the same catalog entry, so they will get the same item number [...]
(5 months ago, Dec 15, 2023, to Catalog Requests)

2 Messages in this Thread:

 Msg 1 « - centexbricks (145) 5 months ago Dec 14, 2023 to Catalog Requests
 Msg 2 - TakeAbricK (13472) 5 months ago Dec 15, 2023 to Catalog Requests

 Previous Message   Next Message 

Entire thread on one page
This message and all its replies on one page

This message was moved from Catalog to Catalog Requests on Dec 14, 2023 by randyf (442)
The status of this message was changed from Open to Completed on Apr 9, 2024