Discussion Forum: Thread 357755 |
|
|
| | Author: | Saitobricks.ca | Posted: | May 14, 2024 12:12 | Subject: | Why is this wrong?! | Viewed: | 191 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| How can the weight be known for this?!
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 14, 2024 12:21 | Subject: | Re: Why is this wrong?! | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| How can the weight be known for this?!
|
It would be for the heaviest version found.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | Saitobricks.ca | Posted: | May 14, 2024 12:23 | Subject: | Re: Why is this wrong?! | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| How can the weight be known for this?!
|
It would be for the heaviest version found.
|
What about the lighter ones? Then the weight would be incorrect.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 14, 2024 12:29 | Subject: | Re: Why is this wrong?! | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| How can the weight be known for this?!
|
It would be for the heaviest version found.
|
What about the lighter ones? Then the weight would be incorrect.
|
You could then use that logic for pretty much everything in the catalogue… it’s
best to over estimate the weight for shipping rather then underestimate. But
even so it isn’t going to be anything crazy
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Author: | Saitobricks.ca | Posted: | May 14, 2024 12:31 | Subject: | Re: Why is this wrong?! | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| How can the weight be known for this?!
|
It would be for the heaviest version found.
|
What about the lighter ones? Then the weight would be incorrect.
|
You could then use that logic for pretty much everything in the catalogue… it’s
best to over estimate the weight for shipping rather then underestimate. But
even so it isn’t going to be anything crazy
|
Ok, just found it strange that a item with weight varying from box to box could
have a weight attached to it.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | May 14, 2024 13:22 | Subject: | Re: Why is this wrong?! | Viewed: | 60 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| How can the weight be known for this?!
|
It would be for the heaviest version found.
|
What about the lighter ones? Then the weight would be incorrect.
|
You could then use that logic for pretty much everything in the catalogue… it’s
best to over estimate the weight for shipping rather then underestimate. But
even so it isn’t going to be anything crazy
|
Ok, just found it strange that a item with weight varying from box to box could
have a weight attached to it.
|
It's not strange at all. It's very, very normal.
For example, most every set for North America is heavier than the sets distributed
elsewhere. The boxes and instructions use different paper. Depending on the size
of the set, it can easily be a difference of 10-20%.
~Jen
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Saitobricks.ca | Posted: | May 14, 2024 14:26 | Subject: | Re: Why is this wrong?! | Viewed: | 56 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| In Catalog, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| How can the weight be known for this?!
|
It would be for the heaviest version found.
|
What about the lighter ones? Then the weight would be incorrect.
|
You could then use that logic for pretty much everything in the catalogue… it’s
best to over estimate the weight for shipping rather then underestimate. But
even so it isn’t going to be anything crazy
|
Ok, just found it strange that a item with weight varying from box to box could
have a weight attached to it.
|
It's not strange at all. It's very, very normal.
For example, most every set for North America is heavier than the sets distributed
elsewhere. The boxes and instructions use different paper. Depending on the size
of the set, it can easily be a difference of 10-20%.
~Jen
|
Hmm, I did not know that.
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | peregrinator | Posted: | May 14, 2024 12:54 | Subject: | Re: Why is this wrong?! | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| How can the weight be known for this?!
|
It has to be somewhere in between the weight of the box plus the six times the
weight of the lightest minifigure polybag and the weight of the box plus six
times the weight of the heaviest minifigure polybag ... in no case would it be
zero.
|
|
|
|
|
|