Discussion Forum: Thread 356083 |
|
|
| | Author: | SezaR | Posted: | Apr 6, 2024 06:58 | Subject: | change additional notes | Viewed: | 78 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Completed | |
|
| change additional notes for the following sets:
Released only in Continental Europe, UK, Australia and Canada.
None of the sets 262, 263 or 264 (and other 26N series) appear on Canadian catalogs
but I had personally bought a lot from Vancouver including Canadian sets that
included 263 and 264.
Recently, somebody on the forum bought 263 from Ontario and I have a photo of
Canadian 264.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | TakeAbricK | Posted: | Apr 7, 2024 01:45 | Subject: | Re: change additional notes | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, SezaR writes:
| change additional notes for the following sets:
Released only in Continental Europe, UK, Australia and Canada.
None of the sets 262, 263 or 264 (and other 26N series) appear on Canadian catalogs
but I had personally bought a lot from Vancouver including Canadian sets that
included 263 and 264.
Recently, somebody on the forum bought 263 from Ontario and I have a photo of
Canadian 264.
|
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=356029&nID=1463298
I don't see any proof that it was a Canadian set from origin. So imo the
note should stay as it is.
Diana
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | TakeAbricK | Posted: | Apr 7, 2024 02:56 | Subject: | Re: change additional notes | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, TakeAbricK writes:
| In Catalog Requests, SezaR writes:
| change additional notes for the following sets:
Released only in Continental Europe, UK, Australia and Canada.
None of the sets 262, 263 or 264 (and other 26N series) appear on Canadian catalogs
but I had personally bought a lot from Vancouver including Canadian sets that
included 263 and 264.
Recently, somebody on the forum bought 263 from Ontario and I have a photo of
Canadian 264.
|
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=356029&nID=1463298
I don't see any proof that it was a Canadian set from origin. So imo the
note should stay as it is.
Diana
|
PS can you add that photo of set 264 from Canada? Thanks, Diana
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | SezaR | Posted: | Apr 7, 2024 16:52 | Subject: | (Cancelled) | Viewed: | 17 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| (Cancelled) |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | SezaR | Posted: | Apr 7, 2024 16:55 | Subject: | Re: change additional notes | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, TakeAbricK writes:
| In Catalog Requests, SezaR writes:
| change additional notes for the following sets:
Released only in Continental Europe, UK, Australia and Canada.
None of the sets 262, 263 or 264 (and other 26N series) appear on Canadian catalogs
but I had personally bought a lot from Vancouver including Canadian sets that
included 263 and 264.
Recently, somebody on the forum bought 263 from Ontario and I have a photo of
Canadian 264.
|
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=356029&nID=1463298
I don't see any proof that it was a Canadian set from origin.
|
Proof is given. These sets were bought and seen by Canadian back in 70s, from
Canada. This is called proof.
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1463627
| So imo the
note should stay as it is.
|
Proof is given. These sets were bought and seen by Canadian back in 70s, from
Canada. This is called proof.
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1463627
For long time, I knew these two sets were sold in Canada as crystal evidence
has been there.
Though last night, having checked Canadian catalogs, I found out these two sets
also appear on the Canadian catalog from 1974.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Author: | TakeAbricK | Posted: | Apr 8, 2024 01:49 | Subject: | Re: change additional notes | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, SezaR writes:
| In Catalog Requests, TakeAbricK writes:
| In Catalog Requests, SezaR writes:
| change additional notes for the following sets:
Released only in Continental Europe, UK, Australia and Canada.
None of the sets 262, 263 or 264 (and other 26N series) appear on Canadian catalogs
but I had personally bought a lot from Vancouver including Canadian sets that
included 263 and 264.
Recently, somebody on the forum bought 263 from Ontario and I have a photo of
Canadian 264.
|
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=356029&nID=1463298
I don't see any proof that it was a Canadian set from origin.
|
Proof is given. These sets were bought and seen by Canadian back in 70s, from
Canada. This is called proof.
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1463627
| So imo the
note should stay as it is.
|
Proof is given. These sets were bought and seen by Canadian back in 70s, from
Canada. This is called proof.
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1463627
For long time, I knew these two sets were sold in Canada as crystal evidence
has been there.
Though last night, having checked Canadian catalogs, I found out these two sets
also appear on the Canadian catalog from 1974.
|
It has been confirmed that both sets appear in the 1974 Canadian catalog (which
I don't have, so I couldn't check myself). It would have saved us both
a lot of time though, when you would have submitted this request with an image
of that catalog of 1974 you have.
Notes have been changed for both sets.
Diana
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Author: | SezaR | Posted: | Apr 9, 2024 04:42 | Subject: | Re: change additional notes | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| | It would have saved us both
a lot of time though, when you would have submitted this request with an image
of that catalog of 1974 you have.
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Apr 9, 2024 13:15 | Subject: | Re: change additional notes | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, SezaR writes:
| | It would have saved us both
a lot of time though, when you would have submitted this request with an image
of that catalog of 1974 you have.
|
|
Looks like the image is to big/tall/wide/square/format/rectangular/turquoise
|
|
|
|
|
|