  
| Author: | akunthita  | | Posted: | Mar 18, 2010 17:18 | | Subject: | Re: Insure/Noninsure Checkboxes when Submit Order | | Viewed: | 60 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| This is a great idea! I voted yes!
In Suggestions, fosterbengoshi writes:
| | Please give sellers the OPTION to require buyers to select insure or not insure
when submitting an order in their shop. Currently, BrickLink only offers a single
checkbox for insurance only, which need not be checked for the order to go through.
As mentioned here:
http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=435576
having the buyer make a deliberate affirmative choice to insure or not insure
is better than the buyer making a passive choice which may not be a conscious
choice at all.
This could work similar to the "I Will Pay By" choices given by sellers who accept
multiple forms of payment, the "I Will Pay In" choices given by sellers who accept
payments in multiple currencies, and the "I would like my order to be shipped
by" choices given by sellers who offer multiple shipping options. See therobo's
checkout page for an example of these choices. If a choice is not made by the
buyer, BrickLink will not allow the order to be submitted. The order can only
be submitted if the buyer makes a choice. As with the shipping choices, each
seller could add a sentence or two explaining the insurance and no insurance
choices. I think allowing this OPTION could help eliminate or resolve some of
the problems that arise with orders that are lost or damaged during shipment.
Again, this is an OPTION for those sellers who want it. If anyone does not want
to use it, they don't have to.
Foster
|
|
|
Message is in Reply To: 57 Messages in this Thread.
(Message tree supressed because there are more than 50 messages in this thread)
show message tree
Entire thread on one page
This message and all its replies on one page
|
|
USA, Florida
