Discussion Forum: Catalog: Message 1455309
 Previous Message   Next Message 
 Author: DeLuca View Messages Posted By DeLuca
 Posted: Feb 17, 2024 01:28
 Subject: Re: Reaction to the R.R. Slugger video
 Viewed: 80 times
 Topic: Catalog
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

DeLuca (288)

Location:  USA, Virginia
Member Since Contact Type Status
Jan 2, 2004 Contact Member Buyer
Buying Privileges - OK
In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
  Set 7171 from 1999 (Mos Espa Podrace):

 
Set No: 7171  Name: Mos Espa Podrace
* 
7171-1 (Inv) Mos Espa Podrace
831 Parts, 10 Minifigures, 1999
Sets: Star Wars: Star Wars Episode 1

is one of the celebrated early Star Wars sets and as such we may consider it
to be at the pinnacle of collector interest. In that set is a yellow dome with
a “blocked open stud” which is part no. 30151a:

[p=30151a,3]

The next version of that part by all accounts was introduced around 2010,
[p=30151b]

and by that time, the Mos Espa Podrace had long been retired. So we can say with
reasonable certainty that this set came originally with domes with blocked open
studs. If you see a copy of the set sitting on someone’s shelf and the domes
on Anakin’s podracer have hollow studs (no little Mercedes symbol), that is a
sure sign that the parts, and maybe even the whole set, is not original.



We only know this because of complete databases like the BrickLink Catalog.


  Next up is set 6745-1 from 2009 (Propeller Power).

 
Set No: 6745  Name: Propeller Power
* 
6745-1 (Inv) Propeller Power
247 Parts, 2009
Sets: Creator: Model: Airport

This also has a red 533 on the nose of the plane, but here the inventory system
says it could have either the “b” or “c” variant. Check the change log to see
if you recognize any of the people who added these variants to the set:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogInvChangeItem.asp?itemType=S&itemNo=6745-1&viewDate=Y&viewStatus=1

We’re pretty sure this came with both “b” and “c” types. It didn’t come with
a vented stud, and someone might mistakenly put one on this model if BrickLink
doesn’t educate them about it, right? That is the premise on why we need these
variants in the catalog, correct?

The thing is, how can we tolerate the difference of stud type in this model,
and not in other models where it is historically incorrect? In this plane model
from 2009, both are correct, so what does that say about the mixing of variants
in other models?


As you say, it is because other cases are historically inaccurate. To use a Star
Wars example, this is like asking why Imperial officers cannot wear single-line
rank insignias post-Yavin when they had a mix of single-line and double-line
ranks (an increasing number of the latter, over time) before Yavin.


  True collectors know that there actually is no replacement part that will ever
perfectly replace a part that is lost. The only truly correct part is the part
the set originally came with. It’s nice to get as close as possible to a correct
replacement part, but it’s a futile attempt.


This is pure cope, and also bull****.

Message is in Reply To:

View Thread Reaction to the R.R. Slugger video - Admin_Russell
Hello again everyone, This is my official response to the video from R.R. Slugger concerning the merging of part variants in the BrickLink catalog: (URL) Here is an initial [...]
(4 months ago, Feb 16, 2024, to Catalog)

Message Has 1 Reply:

View Thread Re: Reaction to the R.R. Slugger video - yorbrick (1185)
[...] It isn't complete and never will be. With the rate new sets are produced and the lack of information about old sets and items, there will always be uninventoried [...]
(4 months ago, Feb 17, 2024, to Catalog)

35 Messages in this Thread:

 Msg 1 - Admin_Russell 4 months ago Feb 16, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 2 - Nubs_Select (3820) 4 months ago Feb 16, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 3 - 1001bricks (52466) 4 months ago Feb 16, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 4 - PlanetEarthToys (119) 4 months ago Feb 16, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 5 « - DeLuca (288) 4 months ago Feb 17, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 6 - yorbrick (1185) 4 months ago Feb 17, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 7 - brickbiters (134) 4 months ago Feb 17, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 8 - calebfishn (2145) 3 months ago Feb 18, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 9 - Tracyd (418) 3 months ago Feb 19, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 10 - Teup (6610) 4 months ago Feb 17, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 11 - Nubs_Select (3820) 4 months ago Feb 17, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 12 - Teup (6610) 4 months ago Feb 17, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 13 - randyf (442) 4 months ago Feb 17, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 14 - macebobo (2459) 4 months ago Feb 17, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 15 - Teup (6610) 4 months ago Feb 17, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 16 - brxstore (794) 4 months ago Feb 18, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 17 - popsicle (6673) 4 months ago Feb 18, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 18 - brxstore (794) 4 months ago Feb 18, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 19 - popsicle (6673) 4 months ago Feb 18, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 20 - randyf (442) 3 months ago Feb 18, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 21 - yorbrick (1185) 3 months ago Feb 18, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 22 - brickbiters (134) 4 months ago Feb 17, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 23 - Reki_Lobsheek (2465) 3 months ago Feb 19, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 24 - Tracyd (418) 3 months ago Feb 19, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 25 - PlanetEarthToys (119) 3 months ago Feb 19, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 26 - Saitobricks.ca (37) 3 months ago Feb 19, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 27 - Saitobricks.ca (37) 3 months ago Feb 19, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 28 - wahiggin (2867) 3 months ago Feb 19, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 29 - GreatBuy (3630) 3 months ago Feb 19, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 30 - SylvainLS (46) 3 months ago Feb 20, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 31 - BrickDeals (2812) 3 months ago Feb 19, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 32 - yorbrick (1185) 3 months ago Feb 20, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 33 - Ziegelmeister (230) 3 months ago Feb 20, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 34 - Saitobricks.ca (37) 3 months ago Feb 26, 2024 to Catalog
 Msg 35 - Saitobricks.ca (37) 2 months ago Apr 12, 2024 to Catalog

 Previous Message   Next Message 

Entire thread on one page
This message and all its replies on one page