Author:  here4bricks614  Posted:  Feb 3, 2024 19:28  Subject:  Re: Bionicle is handled incredibly poorly  Viewed:  36 times  Topic:  Catalog Cancel Reply

BrickLink ID Card here4bricks614 (187) Location:  USA, New Jersey Member Since Contact Type Status Jul 20, 2020 Buyer

In Catalog, WoutR writes:    In Catalog, randyf writes:    I would say it has a better chance than 22 which will almost surely never be added. I just know that 296 is going to be a very hard sell with the direction the site is moving in. I think that the difference between 22 and 221 will be extremely difficult for most sellers. Especially for the parts that were made during the transition period that appear in both versions. https://www.flickr.com/photos/126975831@N07/14777415117/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/126975831@N07/14988645798/ Those are actually the easiest. The fact that 221 has been reformulated so many times is what makes this difficult. Any part in 22 looks identical to modern 221, but almost nothing like original 221. The best time to address this was 2004. It's disappointing to hear that its odds are low, especially given the fact that it is very much doable and is backed up by extensive research. The concerns behind its addition are understandable, however. Still hoping for 225.

Message is in Reply To:

Re: Bionicle is handled incredibly poorly - WoutR (920)

[...] I think that the difference between 22 and 221 will be extremely difficult for most sellers. Especially for the parts that were made during the transition period that [...] (4 months ago, Feb 3, 2024, to Catalog)

Message Has 1 Reply:

Re: Bionicle is handled incredibly poorly - WoutR (920)

[...] I think we can probably separate them in the inventories. But if a seller finds some parts in a lot of used bricks, can he identify them correctly? I'd love to get [...] (4 months ago, Feb 3, 2024, to Catalog)

115 Messages in this Thread.
(Message tree supressed because there are more than 50 messages in this thread)
show message tree