Author: | BUC | Posted: | Jan 28, 2024 21:54 | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - January 26 | Viewed: | 81 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Instead of merging, why not bring back the "undetermined type" entries
for those who don't care about distinguishing variants? The 'parent id'
for the UT then a, b, etc for the variants.
If the goal is to streamline inventories, the UT can be listed in the inventory
with variants listed in the Alternate section.
When wanted lists have the UT listed, all variants should be returned as well
[this functionality would likely need to be built tho].
Added bonus - having "undetermined type" listed in the item description
would indicate that variants of the part exist. Anytime a new variant is identified,
"undetermined type" could be added to the now "parent" entry
and this would automatically CYA the seller who is unaware of (or doesn't
care to separate) the variant, while also allowing those who do care, the option
of now differentiating them.
|
|
Message is in Reply To: Variants Thread - January 26 - Admin_Russell | Hello again everyone, My initial post on this subject earlier this month has garnered almost 700 replies, which is right about the level of the BrickArms threads a few years [...] (4 months ago, Jan 26, 2024, to Catalog) |
Message Has 1 Reply: Re: Variants Thread - January 26 - StormChaser (570) | [...] That's what many of us would like to see. Russell answered your question here: (URL) The short version: maybe they'd consider doing that in the future. But [...] (4 months ago, Jan 28, 2024, to Catalog) |
135 Messages in this Thread. (Message tree supressed because there are more than 50 messages in this thread) show message tree
Entire thread on one page This message and all its replies on one page
|
|