  
| Author: | rickcraine  | | Posted: | Jan 25, 2024 13:10 | | Subject: | Re: 3847 vs 3847a | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, archmage writes:
| | Hello everyone.
I know that Bricklink is close to operate significant variations merge operations
on its inventory, so I don't know if the subject part is also part of this
operations (but I hope it will).
I have used very often Bricklink inventory as reference to complete my sets,
but lately I have noticed that part 3847 seems to have replaced part 3847a in
many old castle sets inventory, and not as an alternate part.
As a lego-castle loving child and then adult I have owned and built many of the
sets I see now listed with 3847 swords and in my experience they doesn't
appear in most of the ones I recall or still have built for exposition.
This post in not meant to be a rant about something I see as a discrepancy, but
more curiosity about how you're dealing with that. For instance I assembled
set 1596 and 1547: both show in the box photos a 3847a sword, but both have as
inventory only a 3847 sword. Should I list them as incomplete, or being a mold
variant I should not?
Thank you for your time and, maybe, answer
|
Another great example as to why things should stay the way they are. Personally,
though, saying it has a mold variant seems like it would be the only logical
thing to do.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:  3847 vs 3847a - archmage (324) | Hello everyone. I know that Bricklink is close to operate significant variations merge operations on its inventory, so I don't know if the subject part is also part of this [...]
(4 months ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Inventories) |
3 Messages in this Thread: Msg 1 - archmage (324) 4 months ago Jan 25, 2024 to Inventories
 Msg 2 « - rickcraine (4) 4 months ago Jan 25, 2024 to Inventories
 Msg 3 - tec (62) 4 months ago Jan 25, 2024 to Inventories
Entire thread on one page
This message and all its replies on one page
|
|
USA, Virginia
