Author: | pathmer | Posted: | Mar 9, 2023 00:00 | Subject: | Re: Possible set inventory mistake | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| Thanks SylvainLS,
So because there is a slight chance that my set got those pieces mixed, does
that mean it is net credible enough evidence? I'm pretty confident that it
came with the (3003), just not 100% sure.
In Inventories, SylvainLS writes:
| In Inventories, pathmer writes:
| Change log shows that (3003) used to be listed as an alternate until Oct 2020,
but was deleted by user paulvdb.
|
See the comments in the discussion (bubbles icon) for the previous change made
on the same day: https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=274513
|
|
|
Message is in Reply To: Message Has 1 Reply: 7 Messages in this Thread: Msg 1 - pathmer (83) 15 months ago Mar 7, 2023 to Inventories Msg 2 - pcthurman (1216) 15 months ago Mar 8, 2023 to Inventories Msg 3 - pathmer (83) 15 months ago Mar 8, 2023 to Inventories Msg 4 - pathmer (83) 15 months ago Mar 8, 2023 to Inventories Msg 5 - SylvainLS (46) 15 months ago Mar 8, 2023 to Inventories Msg 6 « - pathmer (83) 15 months ago Mar 9, 2023 to Inventories Msg 7 - SylvainLS (46) 15 months ago Mar 9, 2023 to Inventories
Entire thread on one page This message and all its replies on one page
|
|