Discussion Forum: Inventories: Message 1391682
 Previous Message   Next Message 
 Author: pcthurman View Messages Posted By pcthurman
 Posted: Feb 5, 2023 15:46
 Subject: Re: 6775 Alpha Team Bomb Squad discrepancies
 Viewed: 32 times
 Topic: Inventories
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

pcthurman (1216)

Location:  USA, Virginia
Member Since Contact Type Status
Apr 20, 2004 Contact Member Buyer
Buying Privileges - OK
In Inventories, pcthurman writes:
  This set
 
Set No: 6775  Name: Alpha Team Bomb Squad
* 
6775-1 (Inv) Alpha Team Bomb Squad
177 Parts, 3 Minifigures, 2001
Sets: Alpha Team
has a discrepancy for the alternate version. The part
 
Part No: 3673  Name: Technic, Pin without Friction Ridges
* 
3673 Technic, Pin without Friction Ridges
Parts: Technic, Pin {Light Gray}
is shown with
the match ID 99 but in the alternate section, it has no match.
Does this mean it is not found in the alternate version?
And if so can the piece be shown in the alternate section with quantity 0 and
a note saying this piece is omitted in the alternate version please?

Secondly, the instruction entry should also show 2 versions of this set. If I
wanted to buy instructions for this set, currently I would have no way of knowing
which version of the instructions I would get other than reaching out to the
store.
I feel that sets with 2 or more versions should have a requirement for stores
to state which version of the instructions they are selling to make it easier
for the buyer.

Thoughts?

Cass T

BUMP

Message is in Reply To:

View Thread 6775 Alpha Team Bomb Squad discrepancies - pcthurman (1216)
This set (Set 6775-1) has a discrepancy for the alternate version. The part (Part 3673,9) is shown with the match ID 99 but in the alternate section, it has no match. Does this [...]
(16 months ago, Feb 4, 2023, to Inventories)

Message Has 1 Reply:

View Thread Re: 6775 Alpha Team Bomb Squad discrepancies - randyf (442)
[...] Sorry that I missed this the first time around. Always busy around here! :) [...] That is correct. [...] That is not how we use match ID 99. You can think [...]
(16 months ago, Feb 5, 2023, to Inventories)

4 Messages in this Thread:

 Msg 1 - pcthurman (1216) 16 months ago Feb 4, 2023 to Inventories
 Msg 2 « - pcthurman (1216) 16 months ago Feb 5, 2023 to Inventories
 Msg 3 - randyf (442) 16 months ago Feb 5, 2023 to Inventories
 Msg 4 - pcthurman (1216) 16 months ago Feb 6, 2023 to Inventories

 Previous Message   Next Message 

Entire thread on one page
This message and all its replies on one page