I can explain why we should do that. In the past it was already included as a
UCS set but was removed due to my request, as at this time 10188 was NOT listed
as UCS in BrickSet UCS list or other UCS lists on other pages.
When you now do the reasearch again, you will see that all UCS lists included
this set as a UCS set. For that reason we should reject my old request and put
it again to the UCS list.
I do not want to start the debate what UCS list means as there is no clear declaration
to that but for this set it is clear as we are the unique catalog that does not
include this set into the UCS list.