Discussion Forum: Catalog: Message 1110713
 Previous Message   Next Message 
 Author: yorbrick View Messages Posted By yorbrick
 Posted: Oct 15, 2018 16:24
 Subject: Re: Dimensions vs studs vs CM vs MM
 Viewed: 25 times
 Topic: Catalog
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

yorbrick (1185)

Location:  United Kingdom, England
Member Since Contact Type Status
Apr 11, 2011 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Yorbricks
In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
  In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
  In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
  I am incrementally becoming more confused about the issue of catalog dimensions.

I know that bricks are supposed to be stored as studs. and set/books/gear are
stored as cm.

When I look at the catalog page for
 
Part No: 3003  Name: Brick 2 x 2
* 
3003 Brick 2 x 2
Parts: Brick
I see 'Size: 2 x 2 x 1 in studs'

When I look at the catalog page for
 
Part No: 3437  Name: Duplo, Brick 2 x 2
* 
3437 Duplo, Brick 2 x 2
Parts: DUPLO, Brick
I see 'Size: 2 x 2 x 1 in studs'

When I look at the dimensions in a catalog XML file I see (for both) …
ITEMDIMX 2 /ITEMDIMX
ITEMDIMY 2 /ITEMDIMY
ITEMDIMZ 1 /ITEMDIMZ

When I look at the values beneath an actual listed lot (3003) I see: 16mm 11.2mm
16mm

When I look at the values beneath an actual listed lot (3437) I see: 32mm 23.6mm
32mm

So that suggests that the XML download file does not actually represent the values
being used by IC … or does it? I don't mind the values I'm receiving,
but I would like access to the real numbers as well.

Remember that LEGO bricks are measured in lego studs, whereas Duplo bricks are
measured in duplo studs. So while both are 2x2x1 in studs, they are measured
in different stud units.

The metric measurements make sense, as the duplo piece is 2x bigger in all dimensions
than the LEGO brick.

All you say is correct and makes sense. But IC does not use studs, it (apparently)
is using mm, and those values are being obscured from view. Why ?

Nita Rae

OK I see what you mean, yes I guess it would be useful to show it on the catalogue
page too.

Message is in Reply To:

View Thread Re: Dimensions vs studs vs CM vs MM - cosmicray (3498)
[...] All you say is correct and makes sense. But IC does not use studs, it (apparently) is using mm, and those values are being obscured from view. Why ? Nita Rae
(69 months ago, Oct 15, 2018, to Catalog)

11 Messages in this Thread:

 Msg 1 - cosmicray (3498) 69 months ago Oct 15, 2018 to Catalog
 Msg 2 - yorbrick (1185) 69 months ago Oct 15, 2018 to Catalog
 Msg 3 - SylvainLS (46) 69 months ago Oct 15, 2018 to Catalog
 Msg 4 - cosmicray (3498) 69 months ago Oct 15, 2018 to Catalog
 Msg 5 - SylvainLS (46) 69 months ago Oct 15, 2018 to Catalog
 Msg 6 - StormChaser (570) 69 months ago Oct 15, 2018 to Catalog
 Msg 7 - SylvainLS (46) 69 months ago Oct 15, 2018 to Catalog
 Msg 8 - cosmicray (3498) 69 months ago Oct 15, 2018 to Catalog
 Msg 9 - SylvainLS (46) 69 months ago Oct 15, 2018 to Catalog
 Msg 10 - cosmicray (3498) 69 months ago Oct 15, 2018 to Catalog
 Msg 11 « - yorbrick (1185) 69 months ago Oct 15, 2018 to Catalog

 Previous Message   Next Message 

Entire thread on one page
This message and all its replies on one page